ZS6EZ's QSLing Status Report for July 2006

Last updated 2006-09-13


Direct QSLs

After an major delay due to pressure of work, I have finally managed to catch up most of the backlog. The status is as shown:

Logs:
Last mailed:
Status:
Misdirected cards (ZS8MI 2004, ZS9Z after 1994 etc.) 2006-06-08 Up to date
ZS8MI (Ops ZS6PT, ZS5AEN, ZS1CDK) 2006-06-10 Up to date
ZS6EZ 2006-06-10 Up to date
ZS8D, ZS8IR, ZS6Z 2006-06-10 Up to date
ZD9IR 2006-06-29 Up to date
5H9IR 2006-07-20 See note

Notes:
1. Around 20 5H9IR cards are still in process. There are problems with the logs for October and November 2003, which we are trying to resolve.
2. Mail received up to 2006-06-01 has been processed. New mail will be tackled as soon as possible.

If you sent a combined request (i.e. multiple callsigns per envelope) your replies will obviously only be mailed when the last callsign on your list is processed.


Direct postage

The minimum postage rate for overseas countries is now R 4,40, which is under US$ 1,00. The IRC still does not cover overseas postage, as it is redeemable for the postage rate to other African countries only.

While we can include several QSL cards per envelope to overseas destinations, large envelopes are a problem. Any envelope with a length of over 235 mm or a width of over 120 mm now costs R 14,70 (around US$ 2,00) to mail. If you use standard envelopes, you're in luck. If you prefer large envelopes, you're probably not.

Our currency is in a gradual decline against most major currencies. Consequently, we have regular postage increases. Annual increases are all but guaranteed, but we also have intermittent increases in between. For this reason, SASEs are not recommended. DX stamp services often do not keep up with postage rates. They also often provide "Standard Postage" stamps, which are not useable for international mail. You may get the letter if you're lucky, but you probably won't. If for some reason you insist on using SASEs rather than some other form of return postage, you must include either enough marked stamps to the amount required, or an "International Standard Letter Rate" stamp. These standard stamps are few and far between, though. They cannot be bought from normal post offices, and I have seldom seen them provided by DX Stamp Services.


Bureau QSLing

All bureau QSLing is up to date, except for a few 5H9IR QSOs made during 2003. The last big bureau batch was dispatched in January 2003. Only a few dozen QSOs have been made since then.

Unfortunately, the SARL is in such a shambles that no cards went out in the first half of 2003. The SARL held on to all the ZS6EZ and ZD9IR cards, refusing to send them out while a tinpot dictator with no comprehension of QSLing wrote a new set of rules for the bureau and insisted on applying them retro-actively. The situation was not resolved until the middle of 2005, when an anonymous donor offered to pay the SARL to send the cards out. The buck-grabbing Council finally agreed on this basis. The cards were finally released in June 2005, and mostly seem to have found their way to the rightful owners.

Logs confirmed via bureau in bulk ("Please QSL"):
3DA0Z, 3DA6Z, 4U1ITU (Op. ZS6EZ), 5H4IR, 5H9IR (up to 2000), V51Z (1994 and after), ZD9IR, ZS3Z/6, ZS6BCR, ZS6Z/4, ZS6Z, ZS8IR, ZS9Z (1994), ZT6Z.
Logs confirmed via bureau on request for at least five years:
A25/ZS6BCR, H5AYB, V51Z, ZS0Z, ZS3Z, ZS6BCR/A22, ZS8D, ZS8MI, ZS9Z (1990/91).
Logs to be confirmed via the bureau:
5H9IR (2003).

No incoming bureau requests are now being answered. That will change once more QSOs are made.


Electronic QSLs

With help from the ARRL staff, notably Wayne Mills N7NG, all recent logs that I manage are now in the Logbook of the World. This fact means that you can now get DXCC credit for all those QSOs, even if you do not have a paper QSL card. Around 165 000 QSOs are included in these electronic logs.

Logs placed on LotW:
3DA0Z, 3DA6Z, 5H4IR, 5H9IR, V51Z (1994 only), ZD9IR, ZS0Z, ZS6EZ, ZS6Z, ZS8IR, ZS9Z (1994 only) and ZT6Z.

Email requests

I have decided to stop answering email enquiries about QSLs. During the early part of 2000, I wasted much time on this practice, as a few individuals who boorishly demanded information continued to harrass me. One individual, whose card had been sent but did not get to him, had the audacity to complain about the fact that he'd sent 23 emails over a period of a few weeks; as if that somehow reflected on me. Given that I'd answered all his questions without delay, I really didn't think that I had been the problem!

In the past, I had incidents where the volume of work contributed to an error or two in replying to email requests. I had to put up with invective that peeled the paint off my walls. In the end, I decided that I'd much rather spend the energy answering the heaps of snail-mail that arrive.

So: Sorry about this, but if you have a problem with a QSL, please resort to the time-proven technique of snail mail. As I do not routinely have problems with mail loss, no more than a handful of people will be inconvenienced.


Questions?

If you have more questions, you might want to check out my QSLing policy or a list of Frequently Asked Questions elsewhere on this Web site.

Return to ZS6EZ's Radio Page